ANALYSIS
The 'Hispanic Paradox': Why Latinos live longer and defy statistics in the US
For decades, the country has witnessed a phenomenon that baffles epidemiologists, demographers and public health officials: Hispanics—many of them with low incomes, limited access to health insurance and exposed to harsh working conditions—live, on average, longer than almost any other ethnic group in the nation.
Hispanic celebration in the U.S. (File image).
For decades, the United States has witnessed a phenomenon that baffles epidemiologists, demographers and public health officials: Hispanics—many of them with low incomes, limited access to health insurance and exposed to harsh working conditions—live, on average, longer than almost any other ethnic group in the country.
The so-called "Hispanic Paradox" has become one of the most persistent national health enigmas.
A pattern that defies statistics
The data is consistent: despite facing factors typically associated with worse health outcomes—such as less regulated diets, language barriers and less access to the health care system—Latinos (especially Mexican Americans) show lower mortality rates in multiple categories.
Life expectancy, according to CDC studies, typically exceeds that of non-Hispanic whites and African Americans by several years.
What the data shows: Results outside expectations
Various national analyses (NCHS, CDC, 2014-2023) show that Hispanics have lower mortality rates than non-Hispanic white and black groups, even when adjusting for variables such as age, income, and education.
2. Higher life expectancy
Over the past several decades, and even before the pandemic, figures have consistently shown that the life expectancy of this group is higher:
- Hispanic: approximately 82-84 years
- Non-Hispanic white: approximately 77-78 years
- Non-Hispanic black: approximately 72-74 years
- Lower mortality from heart disease, the leading cause of death in the U.S.
- Lower mortality from cancer, the second leading cause of death.
- Lower mortality from stroke.
- Lower than expected infant mortality rates, especially among mothers of Mexican origin.
- Fewer low birth weight babies, even with limited access to formal prenatal care.
The CDC reports (2020, 2022) confirm that this four- to seven-year advantage is maintained over most measurement cycles.
3. Lower rates of serious illness
Latinos have:
Studies such as those from Fenelon et al. (2017) and Arias et al. (2015) have shown that cardiovascular mortality is markedly lower than that of non-Hispanic whites, even after adjusting for factors such as age, smoking, and educational attainment.
4. Surprisingly positive perinatal outcomes
This is one of the most striking aspects of the paradox:
These patterns have been documented in multiple studies, including the work of university professors and Ph.D.s Felice J. Levine and R. Hummer, and NCHS reports.
Most notably: Paradox persists even when controlling for income and education
The academic research agrees that the longevity advantage observed in Hispanics is still present even when adjusting for variables such as income, education, and socioeconomic status, indicating that it is not simply a matter of material inequality.
Furthermore, this advantage is not limited to newly arrived immigrants: it also appears, albeit to a lesser degree, in certain subgroups of U.S.-born Hispanics, suggesting the presence of cultural or community factors that transcend the initial migration.
The researchers have shown that the difference cannot be fully explained by healthier habits, such as a lower smoking rate in the first generation, nor by possible biases in the data, such as the return migration of sick people to their countries of origin.
The magnitude and persistence of the pattern exceeds what could be justified by registry or methodological errors. It is precisely this consistency—across time, across different studies and different groups within the Latino population—that has made the Hispanic Paradox one of the most persistent and debated enigmas in national public health research.
How this phenomenon is explained: The main hypotheses
1. "Healthy immigrant selection"
Those who emigrate tend to be healthier and more resilient than the average population in their countries of origin.
2. Strong social ties and strong family structures
Social cohesion—support among relatives and neighbors, low historical prevalence of living alone, importance of community—appears to have a protective effect against chronic stress.
Markides and Eschbach (2005) reinforce this idea.
3. Reduced tobacco use (especially in first generation)
Multiple CDC reports show that Latino immigrants have lower smoking rates, one of the most important factors in longevity.
4. Less processed diets in earlier generations
Traditional diets—more grains, legumes, fruits and less ultra-processed food—tend to deteriorate in later generations, coinciding with the gradual loss of the "edge."
5. "Salmon bias"
Hispanic immigrants who are older or seriously ill often return to their country of origin to die (especially Mexico). Their deaths are not recorded in U.S. statistics, which also to some extent artificially lowers Hispanic mortality rates in the country.
Society
Vibrant, educated, young and Christian: A breakdown of the US Hispanic community
Williams Perdomo
The paradox is not eternal: Signs of erosion
Although the Hispanic Paradox has shown a consistent advantage in longevity and health, it is not sustained indefinitely. Various longitudinal studies have documented signs of erosion, especially as generations of Latinos become more deeply integrated into American society.
- Second and third generations: Children and grandchildren of immigrants tend to gradually lose the health advantage observed in the first generation. This is reflected in mortality and morbidity indicators that approach national averages.
- Increase in chronic diseases: Obesity, Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease increase in these generations, showing that prolonged exposure to certain typically American lifestyles and diets has a negative impact.
- Lifestyles and acculturation: The adoption of more processed eating habits, increased sedentary lifestyles, and diminished family and community networks contribute to the initial advantage being diluted.
Taken together, these findings suggest that the Hispanic Paradox is not just a biological phenomenon, but is deeply linked to cultural and social factors, the preservation of which could be key to maintaining the health benefits observed in first-generation immigrants.
In other words, the paradox not only challenges the traditional theory that "more resources equals better health," but provides evidence that investing in communities, social cohesion and emotional support could be as effective as improving access to medical services.
But if anything, the studies make clear that generational changes, acculturation and lack of access to health services jeopardize this advantage for Hispanics, showing that living longer does not always mean living in better health.
LATEST
