Supreme Court strikes down much of Donald Trump's tariff policy
The top court, with a conservative majority, decided the case by a six-to-three vote, concluding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorize the President to impose tariffs."

Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by imposing a sweeping set of tariffs through an emergency law, in a decision that deals a major blow to a central tool of his economic and trade policy.
The top court, with a conservative majority, decided the case by six votes to three, concluding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) "does not authorize the President to impose tariffs." The ruling thus blocks part of the tariffs that the Trump administration had applied to products from numerous countries, disrupting global trade.
Blow to a key tool of his agenda
The ruling specifically affects tariffs that Trump imposed invoking national emergency powers, including the so-called "reciprocal" tariffs, which reached 34% in the case of China and a minimum of 10% for other countries, as well as 25% tariffs on certain products from Canada, China and Mexico linked to the fight against fentanyl trafficking.
However, the decision does not eliminate all tariffs established during his administration. Those imposed through other laws, such as those applied to steel and aluminum, remain in force.
The ruling represents an unusual setback for the White House, especially considering that the court has a conservative majority of six justices to three.
Politics
'Will seriously suffer the consequences': Trump lashes out at six Republican representatives for Canada tariff vote
Luis Francisco Orozco
Limits on presidential power
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the authority to set tariffs. Although the IEEPA allows the president to regulate international trade during national emergencies, the court concluded that that law does not explicitly authorize the imposition of customs tariffs.
Prior to Trump, no president had used this 1977 legislation to implement tariffs. The case reached the highest court following rulings against the administration in lower courts and lawsuits filed by importing companies and a coalition of states.
Just The News
US steel production surpasses Japan for first time since 1999 amid tariffs
Just The News / Natalia Mittelstadt
Economic impact and possible next steps
Despite the setback, the president could attempt to reinstate some of these tariffs using other laws that do explicitly provide for the imposition of tariffs.
The ruling reaffirms Congress's role as principal authority on trade matters and limits the unilateral use of executive power in policies with broad economic impact.