Voz media US Voz.us

In addition to spending, reforming the SNAP food assistance program could be a problem for Trump's mega bill in the Senate

Specifically, some senators fear that the House's proposed changes would inordinately affect their respective states' accounts.

John Thune on Capitol Hill/ Drew Angerer.

John Thune on Capitol Hill/ Drew Angerer.AFP

Joaquín Núñez
Published by

Senate Republicans are reviewing the House-passed version of the mega bill. While the fiscal issues are expected to be the most debated by senators, there are questions about the changes the current legislation raises about the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as Food Stamps, the nation's largest food assistance program. Specifically, some senators fear that the proposed changes would inordinately affect their respective states' accounts.

Central to the House version of SNAP is that it would require states to cover a portion of the benefit costs of the program, which is currently funded entirely by the federal government.

Some senators who were at least hesitant about that were John Boozman (R-AR) and John Hoeven (R-ND). "That’s something that I heard some members voice concern about. So, we’ll need to address that," Boozman, current chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said.

The Arkansas senator remarked that some of his colleagues "want to look specifically at how those particular policies will affect their individual states."

"That’s in the we’ll see category. I’m not sure what’s going to happen with that. We’re going to talk to committee members who can talk to our caucus as a whole," Senator Hoeven told The Hill, adding that the House proposal goes "beyond" what some senators had been looking at for "accountability" efforts.

What is SNAP and how does it work?

The Department of Agriculture (USDA), currently headed by Brooke Rollins, administers the program through the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS).

The government delivers the money on an electronic card, called EBT, which can only be used to purchase food in supermarkets, other markets and authorized businesses. The amount received by each household depends on some variables such as income and number of members.

Although all of the money invested in the program comes from the federal government, the states administer it locally, either by processing applications, distributing the cards, or determining applicants' eligibility, among other things.

The Republican proposal to reform SNAP

Specifically, and among other things, the House-passed bill would do the following:

-Require states to bear a portion of the program's costs, thereby incentivizing them to administer SNAP in a more "efficient and effective" manner.

-Prevent future administrations from unilaterally increasing SNAP benefits above inflation, which would correct "the Biden Administration's illegal overreach."

-Increase the age limit from 54 to 64 and limit waivers to caregivers of children under age 7. Currently, individuals between the ages of 18 and 54 who are able to work and have no dependents (children) are subject to the time limit to receive SNAP benefits, which requires them to work 80 hours per month or participate in skilled work programs for more than 3 months in a 3-year period.

-End "the manipulation of geographic areas by states and limits eligibility for waivers of the work requirement to periods of high unemployment."

-Prevent states from "intentionally manipulating the system with nominal energy payments to households to artificially increase SNAP benefits."

-Reverse a Biden administration rule that "inflated" SNAP benefits through excessive utility deductions.

-Restrict SNAP for illegal aliens.

-Eliminate the SNAP Nutrition Education Program (SNAP-Ed), which is described as "duplicative and ineffective."
tracking