Voz media US Voz.us

Analisys

Trump administration rejects Net-Zero Framework that relies on the UN

“Will not tolerate any action that increases costs for our citizens, energy providers, shipping companies and their customers, or tourists,” the administration said in a Department of State statement.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio.Associated Press/LaPresse / Cordon Press

Agustina Blanco
Published by

The Trump administration has stepped up its opposition to the "Net-zero Framework" proposed by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), which reports to the UN, calling it a "global carbon tax" that would hurt U.S. consumers and industry.

This position was articulated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, and Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy puts global shipping decarbonization regulations in check ahead of the IMO meeting in October this year, where formal adoption of the framework is expected.

The Net-zero Framework, approved in April by the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 83), seeks to establish the first global mechanism combining mandatory emissions limits with greenhouse gas pricing for the maritime sector.

Along those lines, starting in 2027, transoceanic vessels over 5,000 gross tons, responsible for 85% of international shipping's CO2 emissions, would be required to meet greenhouse gas intensity standards and purchase corrective units if they exceed emissions thresholds. In addition, the framework would create a Zero Net Emissions Fund to finance low-emission ships, support innovation and mitigate impacts in vulnerable countries.

However, the Trump administration argues that these measures would encumber energy, transportation and cruise costs for Americans, by imposing charges on ships that do not meet the proposed fuel standards. According to the official statement released by the Department of State, the framework favors China by requiring expensive fuels not available on a global scale, while restricting technologies such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) and biofuels, in which the United States leads.

"Will not tolerate any action that increases costs for our citizens, energy providers, shipping companies and their customers, or tourists," the Administration stated, warning other IMO members that it will seek support against the proposal and consider "retaliation" if unsuccessful.

Along those lines, in a message on X, Secretary Rubio reiterated this position: “The United States will not accept any environmental agreement that harms the interests of the American people. The International Maritime Organization’s proposal for a “Net-zero Framework” is a tax on Americans levied by an unaccountable UN organization.“ In addition, Rubio noted that the decision was also endorsed by Secretaries Duffy, Wright and Lutnick and their respective secretaries.

Criticism of the Republican administration's move

Trump's opposition comes amid criticism of his tariff policies, which, according to Jonathan Gold of the National Retail Federation, are raising consumer prices and hurting small businesses.

For its part, the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), which represents 80% of the world's merchant fleet, supports the framework, but urges clarity on incentives for clean fuels. "The IMO needs to formally adopt the Net-zero Framework in October to send a clear signal to industry," Thomas A. Kazakos, ICS secretary general, noted.

Environmental agreements in the Trump administration: US first

Already in the White House, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled "Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements," which withdraws the United States from the Paris Agreement on climate change, fulfilling a campaign promise. The order further instructs the U.S. Ambassador to the UN to immediately notify withdrawal from the agreement and any similar commitments under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, deeming the withdrawal effective upon notification. In addition, all climate change-related financial commitments, including the U.S. International Climate Finance Plan, are revoked, and various government agencies are ordered to cease policies that implement it. The order reflects the policy of prioritizing U.S. economic interests, arguing that agreements such as the Paris Agreement divert taxpayer funds to countries that do not need them and restrict U.S. economic development. Trump justified the decision, noting that the Paris Agreement imposes unfair burdens, favors countries such as China and India and does not reflect U.S. values or contributions on economic and environmental issues. It also directs agencies to prioritize economic efficiency and prosperity in future international energy agreements, promoting fossil fuels and declaring a "national energy emergency" to boost oil and gas production.
tracking