Trump administration set to lay off 15,000 IRS employees
Former President Joe Biden grew the agency through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which appropriated about $87 billion for the agency.

The Trump administration is evaluating up to 15,000 layoffs at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). After the agency grew in budget and employees during Joe Biden's time in the Oval Office, the new Republican administration is taking a cutback approach in the federal government that would affect the IRS.
As reported by The New York Times, a member of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was spotted at IRS headquarters in recent days, further ramping up speculation about the layoffs.
According to an order from the Office of Personnel Management, which handles human resources in the federal government, agencies were ordered to lay off probationary employees. Although the number is not yet confirmed, it could eventually affect as many as 15,000 people at the IRS.
Politics
Mass layoffs: Trump administration fires thousands of federal employees after expiration of deferred waiver offer
Emmanuel Alejandro Rondón
Politics
DOGE recovers $1.9 billion that was ’misplaced during the Biden administration’
Luis Francisco Orozco
"About 15,000 IRS employees have been identified for possible termination as early as next week as the White House seeks to find cost savings across the government," noted from ABC.
As for the goal of cutting Federal Government staff, the Trump administration hopes to reduce the workforce by 5% to 10% through a deferred resignation program, inspired in part by the layoff initiative that had been implemented by Elon Musk at the time of acquiring Twitter, now rebranded as X.
The IRS and the Biden administration
In effect, he earmarked $80 billion to hire 87,000 new agents by 2031. Of the total budget, $45.6 billion would go to stronger law enforcement, $25.3 billion to improve operational support, $4.8 billion to enterprise systems and $3.2 billion to the taxpayer services area.
🛠 Do you think there is an error in this article?
Recommendations




















