The Trump administration backs agro-industrial giant Monsanto in Supreme Court dispute over cancer lawsuits
The specific case in question is a lawsuit in the state of Missouri in which, under its failure-to-warn law, cancer patient John Durnell received $1.25 million in compensation.

File image of the Supreme Court in Washington D.C.
The administration of President Donald Trump on Tuesday backed Monsanto Company in its effort to get the Supreme Court to be able to shield it from liability stemming from several cancer lawsuitsrelated to its Roundup herbicide. In a brief filed with the high court, the Republican administration argued that lawsuits alleging the company failed to warn consumers of all the details related to the health impact of its herbicide were preempted by federal law.
In its brief, the Trump administration noted that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers glyphosate, which is one of the main ingredients in the company's herbicide, to be probably not carcinogenic and has approved its use. Similarly, the conservative administration asserted in its brief that states should not be able to impose additional requirements that would result in failure-to-warn lawsuits. "The labeling requirements imposed by Missouri’s failure-to-warn law are preempted by [the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act,]," the brief notes.
Politics
North Dakota Supreme Court overturns earlier lower court ruling and bans abortion in the state
Agustina Blanco
Potential friction with MAHA movement
The specific case in question is a lawsuit in the state of Missouriin which, under its failure-to-warn law, cancer patient John Durnell received compensation of $1.25 million. The case could have far-reaching consequences, not only because Monsanto faces 100,000 other similar lawsuits, but also because the Administration's decision to position itself in favor of the company could generate friction with the Make America Healthy Again movement, also known as MAHA.
Several activists from that group, which has a presence both within the Republican Party and the administration itself, have spoken out on several occasions against what they have seen as an effort by the U.S. Congress to shield pesticide companies from their own legal liability.
Bayer supported the Trump Administration's decision
"The support of the U.S. Government is an important step and good news for U.S. farmers, who need regulatory clarity. The stakes could not be higher as the misapplication of federal law jeopardizes the availability of innovative tools for farmers and investments in the broader U.S. economy," Bayer CEO Bill Anderson said in a written statement.