Voz media US Voz.us

Federal judge blocks NIH from implementing Trump's cuts program in 22 Democratic states

The cuts Trump imposed on Monday, Feb. 10, are still in effect in other states across the country.

NIH, in file image.

NIH, in file image.Wikimedia Commons / Chris Spielmann

Published by

2 minutes read

Massachusetts District Court Judge in Boston, Angel Kelley, temporarily blocked the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from implementing U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to cut health research grants. Kelley's move is one of temporary restraint and will prevent the U.S. government from imposing the cuts it had lined up for 22 states, which had previously sued to block this funding reduction. Despite this, the cuts that Trump imposed this Monday, February 10 are still in effect in other states across the country.

Kelley also ordered the NIH to submit a status report within 24 hours and at biweekly intervals thereafter. The judge, who was assigned to her position during the administration of former President Joe Biden, explained that this will be crucial to confirming “the regular disbursement and obligation of federal financial assistance funds.” Kelley also detailed that a hearing will be held on February 21 to evaluate the next steps to be taken.

Lawsuit by 22 Democratic states

The judge's decision came in response to a lawsuit filed by the attorneys general of the 22 Democratic states where the cuts would be imposed. They argued that it was necessary to prevent the NIH from implementing the measures in the cuts program, as they would result in "catastrophic financial consequences."

Similarly, the attorneys general argued in their lawsuit that the policy the Trump administration wants to implement in this regard could lead not only to the layoff of thousands of workers across the country, but also to disruptions in clinical trials and the closure of research programs. Furthermore, these attorneys general explained in the lawsuit that all of these side effects would put the health and lives of millions of people in these 22 states at risk.

$4 billion in savings

On its end, the Trump administration has explained that cutting billions of dollars in indirect biomedical research grant costs is a key part of its spending reduction program. In a statement issued last Friday, February 7, the NIH explained that in order for the country to have the best medical research in the world, "It is accordingly vital to ensure that as many funds as possible go towards direct scientific research costs rather than administrative overhead." Also, the agency estimated that such cuts would save $4 billion.

Found a mistake? Contact us!

RECOMMENDATION

Invertir fondos públicos en un medio de comunicación privado es corrupción
Invertir fondos públicos en un medio de comunicación privado es corrupción
0 seconds of 1 minute, 26 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
01:26
01:26
 
tracking