Voz media US Voz.us

Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly sues War Department over military pension review

The court action also names several top officials including Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan.

U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz.

U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz.Saul Loeb/ AFP

Sabrina Martin
Published by

Arizona Democratic senator and retired naval officer Mark Kelly filed a federal lawsuit against the War Department and several top officials after the agency took steps to downgrade his retirement range and reduce his military pension. The conflict was sparked after Kelly participated in a video along with other Democratic lawmakers in which they urged members of the Armed Forces to reject "unlawful orders" from the Trump Administration.

The court action was filed in Washington, D.C., and names as defendants the secretary of war, Pete Hegseth; the War Department; the U.S. Navy; and Secretary of the Navy John Phelan. In the brief, Kelly contends that the executive branch's decisions lack legal standing and violate constitutional protections linked to congressional independence.

The message that triggered the dispute

The case stems from a video released on November 18, in which Kelly appeared alongside Senator Elissa Slotkin and Representatives Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan, Maggie Goodlander and Jason Crow. Addressing serving military and intelligence officers, the lawmakers noted that the law is clear and that illegal orders can and should be refused.

Following the release of the video, the War Department responded that Kelly's status as a sitting senator does not exempt him from accountability and warned that additional conduct could result in further disciplinary action. In December, the Pentagon announced the initiation of a full command investigation against Kelly for "serious misconduct."

Formal censure

As part of that process, Hegseth sent a letter of censure to Kelly in which he stated that his statements did not promote good order or discipline. Such communications are often used to document misconduct and can serve as grounds for reductions in rank, salary or benefits, as well as serve as a warning against more severe sanctions in the event of a repeat offense.

Legal authority to cut Mark Kelly's retirement

The Donald Trump administration maintains that the secretary of war can review Kelly's military retirement based on Chapter 10 of the United States Code, which regulates the operation of the Armed Forces. The regulations state that officers retire with the highest grade served "satisfactorily," although they provide for exceptions.

One exception allows for a reopening of the retirement grade determination if the appropriate secretary concludes that "good cause" exists, under current regulations. In such cases, the law requires that the military retiree be given a reasonable opportunity to respond. According to available information, Hegseth gave Kelly 30 days to file his pleadings, with a resolution expected in approximately 45 days. If the recognized grade is reduced, the military pension would be adjusted to the newly determined rank.
tracking