Voz.us

Voz media US Voz.us

Texas is forced to remove floating wall from the Rio Grande and Abbott threatens to go to the Supreme Court

According to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the state did not use proper bureaucratic channels when it installed the barrier in June.

Rio Grande

Wikimedia Commons

Published by

Topics:

Texas must remove the floating barrier that was installed in the Rio Grande to force illegal immigrants to cross through other border crossings. By a 2-1 vote, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the initial ruling from September, confirming that Greg Abbott must remove the barrier, which is approximately 1,000 feet.

According to the court's decision, the river is navigable, so the barrier represents an "obstruction" to the passage. Therefore, Texas should have asked the United States Army Corps of Engineers for permission before building it.

Governor Abbott spoke out against the decision on his X account, formerly known as Twitter, where he even promised to take the case to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).

"The 5th Cir. Court of Appeals' denial of Texas' sovereign authority to secure the border with floating marine barriers is clearly wrong. AG Paxton & I will seek an immediate rehearing by the entire court. We'll go to SCOTUS if needed to protect Texas from Biden's open borders," the Republican wrote.

Abbott initially ordered the deployment of the barrier as part of Operation Lone Star, which aimed to stop illegal immigration along the 1,200-mile border. To do this, about $850,000 was spent on the barrier, comprised of a row of buoys separated by saw blades, which support a submerged mesh network designed to deter migrants from crossing the Rio Grande.

Barely a month after its placement, the Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the state in federal court in Austin, arguing that the barrier had been installed without the required federal authorization. For its part, Texas argued that the primary function of the barrier was to deter migrants from crossing that route, indirectly channeling them to the appropriate entry points.

tracking