Voz media US Voz.us

Court temporarily restricts DOGE's access to Social Security systems

The court order mandates deleting personal data and allowing access to information under certain conditions.

DOGE leader Elon Musk at the White House.

DOGE leader Elon Musk at the White House.Cordon Press.

Sabrina Martin
Published by

1 minute read

A federal court issued a temporary order to restrict the Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) access to Social Security Administration (SSA) systems in the context of litigation over the handling of government information.

Court order and removal of data

Federal Judge Ellen Hollander of Maryland ordered Thursday that DOGE stop accessing SSA systems and delete any personally identifiable data it obtained. The decision comes in response to a request filed by unions and retiree associations, who argued that this access posed a risk to citizens' privacy. However, the order allows DOGE personnel to access redacted or de-identified information, provided they comply with training and background checks.

DOGE's functions and the government's position

The Trump administration has defended DOGE's work, noting that its goal is to identify fraud and reduce waste in the federal government. According to the government, the team is comprised of 10 federal employees within SSA, seven of whom only have read-only clearances on agency systems.

Government attorneys argued that this access is not unusual, as authorized SSA personnel regularly query the databases as part of their duties. However, the plaintiffs argue that DOGE's participation is exceptional and should be limited.

Research and legal disputes

DOGE has had access to other government databases, including those of the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). However, Judge Hollander expressed doubts about the team's justification for accessing SSA data and suggested that its approach was not supported by sufficient evidence of fraud. In her ruling, she called DOGE's actions a possible "fishing expedition" in search of wrongdoing.

The DOGE team has been involved in multiple litigations regarding its operations, and several judges have assessed its scope. While some decisions have called into question their methods, there has been no judicial consensus on whether its actions constitute an imminent risk to the security of government information.

Found a mistake? Contact us!

RECOMMENDATION

Invertir fondos públicos en un medio de comunicación privado es corrupción
Invertir fondos públicos en un medio de comunicación privado es corrupción
0 seconds of 1 minute, 26 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
01:26
01:26
 
tracking