Uruguay: six people accused of trafficking Venezuelan migrants
Among those charged is the chief notary of the Uruguayan Ministry of Defense, Sonia Mora Pintos. The victims were more than 30 Venezuelans who were exploited for labor.
The head of the notary of the Ministry of Defense of Uruguay, Sonia Mora Pintos, has been indicted - along with five other people - on charges of "criminal association" and "human trafficking" due to her participation in a grid of "labor exploitation" who was looking for Venezuelan citizens to work in "different activities that undermine their human dignity."
According to the formal text, the victims were more than 30 Venezuelans who worked in a gemstones quarry, and one of them was the one who filed the complaint.
The Venezuelans were transferred to Uruguay with the promise of receiving payments of between $1,500 and $2,000. The job offers were spread through the Telegram network and they had interviews via video calls where the defendants offered them payments, accommodation, meals and even medical insurance. The working hours would be 8 hours, but people worked almost 12 hours a day and received a maximum payment of $250. That is, the working conditions were never met.
Request for preventive detention for the accused
The The Prosecutor's Office requested preventive detention for all the accused. But the judge in the case made the decision to apply the measures of "obligation to establish domicile, prohibition of leaving the national territory and retention of their travel documents, prohibition of communication and approach to the victims, night house arrest and the use of electronic monitoring devices"
In the Department of Artigas (bordering Brazil and Argentina), prosecutor Sabrina Massaferro was the one who made the accusation and narrated the events:
The Tickets from Venezuela to Uruguay were bought by the defendants. Prosecutor Massaferro assured that Mora Pintos appeared in front of the victims at the airport "as the company's lawyer." A few days later, he withheld their documents and "made them sign an affidavit and the contracts had to be signed without prior reading."
The text of the case concluded: