Voz media US Voz.us

ANALYSIS

The CBO warned that the Social Security retirement fund will be depleted by mid-2032 and that, without congressional reform, benefits from that fund would fall by about 26%

The CBO's projection is somewhat more pessimistic than that of the Social Security trustees themselves, who, in their annual June report, projected that the OASI fund would be depleted in the fourth quarter of 2032 and estimated an automatic cut of 22%.

The U.S. Social Security Administration's website

The U.S. Social Security Administration's websiteNurPhoto via AFP.

Carlos Dominguez
Published by

An analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) of the projections from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) warned that the Social Security retirement trust fund will run out of reserves by mid-2032.

CBO projection: insolvency in 2032 and a 26% cut

According to the analysis by the CRFB reported by Newsweek, the CBO projects that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) fund, which pays retirement and survivor benefits, will exhaust its reserves by around mid-2032. The CRFB estimates this will happen around the second quarter. At that point, payroll tax revenue would cover only about 74% of scheduled benefits, which, without congressional reform, would require a cut of approximately 26% to balance expenditures and revenue.

The CBO's projection is somewhat more pessimistic than that of the Social Security trustees themselves, who, in their annual June report, projected that the OASI fund would be depleted in the fourth quarter of 2032 and estimated an automatic cut of 22%.

Key figures: CBO vs. Social Security Trustees

Date of insolvency of the retirement fund (OASI):
  • Social Security Trustees: fourth quarter of 2032
  • CBO: mid-2032
Initial cut after depletion:
  • Social Security Trustees: about 22% (78% of benefits paid)
  • CBO: about 26%
Projected cut by the end of the century if no reforms are made:
  • Social Security Trustees: 38%
  • CBO: 40%
Long-term funding gap:
  • Social Security Trustees: 4.42% of taxable payroll
  • CBO: 4.57% of taxable payroll

Why it matters: more than 70 million beneficiaries

The program supports more than 70 million people. For some retirees, this is not a bonus—it is the bulk of their monthly income. That is why the depletion of the OASI fund is not an abstract debate. Without legislation to bridge the gap, benefits would no longer be paid at 100% and would be adjusted based on ongoing payroll contributions. Those who rely almost entirely on that check would be the first to feel the cut.

In remarks to Newsweek, financial literacy instructor Alex Beene of the University of Tennessee at Martin raised the same dilemma from two perspectives. Those who are already retired and rely heavily on Social Security might have to cut back on other expenses if their benefits drop by nearly a quarter. Those who are still working, on the other hand, might end up paying more taxes or accepting different rules for their future pensions.

Rising costs, stagnant incomes

The CRFB notes that the program's cost rose from 10.7% of taxable wages in 1990 to the current 15.0% and is projected to reach 16.5% in 2032, while revenues barely rose from 12.7% to 12.9%. That gap, the committee says, fuels the imbalance.

Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group, told Newsweek that, if action isn't taken soon, "these numbers will become increasingly dire" and that each new projection brings the timeline forward and increases the cuts.

Combined scenario: Disability fund cannot save the system

Even in a hypothetical scenario in which Congress would allow funds to be transferred from the Disability Insurance (DI) fund to the retirement fund, the combined funds would be depleted by 2033, resulting in a 23% cut for beneficiaries, according to the CBO.

Social Security trustees, for their part, project that the Disability Insurance (DI) fund will remain solvent throughout the 75-year projection period, but that the combined OASDI fund will be depleted in the third quarter of 2034.

Options on the table, but no bipartisan agreement

The debate on Capitol Hill is nothing new. To balance the books, there is talk of raising payroll taxes, raising or removing the taxable earnings cap, cutting benefits for retirees with higher incomes, and gradually raising the retirement age. What has been missing is an agreement between Republicans and Democrats that would truly close the gap.

According to the 2026 Trustees' Report, Social Security administrators quantify what it would have cost to act now. If the reforms had taken effect in January 2026, it would have been sufficient to raise the payroll tax from 12.4% to 16.65% or to reduce projected benefits by 25.2% for current and future recipients. If we wait until the combined reserves are depleted in 2034, the adjustment would be harsher: the rate would rise to 17.3%, or benefits would fall by 28.5% starting that year.
tracking