Justice Department opposes independent expert review of documents seized from Donald Trump
He claims that the former president committed a crime of "obstruction" for the handling of classified documents in his possession.
Former President Donald Trump claimed in a court filing that the documents found in his Mar-a-Lago mansion were in a secure location and that it was to be expected that among the files there was classified material because they were presidential records.
Trump's lawyers made these arguments during the trial in which the Department of Justice (DoJ) used an image as part of the impeachment evidence showing the files on the floor. The DoJ asserts that the former president committed a crime of "obstruction" for handling classified documents.
The judge's decision
Trump filed a lawsuit demanding that an independent expert witness be appointed to review the materials seized by the FBI, alleging that his constitutional rights had been violated in the raid on his Mar-a-Lago home.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) opposes this request, as the former president's claim "fails on multiple and independent grounds." According to federal prosecutors, it would "harm national security interests" because some of the documents found in a search were "likely concealed and removed" from a storage facility:
Judge Aileen Cannon, who is handling the case, has been willing to appoint an expert witness to oversee the Mar-a-Largo search, but before making a decision she will hear from the parties.
Controversial photo used as evidence
Trump criticized on Truth Social the image submitted by the Department of Justice showing the files with the words Secret and Top secret. The former president claimed that he had declassified all the documents in the photo and criticized the way the FBI dumped the records on the floor:
Trump's lawyers have consistently avoided using the former president's argument that "they're all declassified."