Voz media US Voz.us

'Twitter Files' part 4: the obsession with Donald Trump

Elon Musk and journalist Michael Shellenberger reveal how the social media changed its own policies to censor the president for life.

Twitter Donald Trump

(Twitter)

Published by

A new installment of Twitter Files this Saturday night revealed the eagerness of former Twitter executives to silence Donald Trump's message in 2021.

This time, it is freelance writer and journalist Michael Shellenberger who details in a Twitter thread the steps the company's top executives took to cancel and permanently ban the former president.

The files expose the chaos at the Big Tech Company on Jan. 7, the day after the Capitol riots. Michael Shellenberger details how "Twitter executives build the case for a permanent ban."

The journalist details how after the riots on Capitol Hill, "internal and external pressure" increased against former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to enact the ban against the 45th president.

In this regard, Shellenberger notes that on January 7, 2021, Dorsey sent an email to employees saying that "Twitter needs to remain consistent in its policies, including the right of users to return to Twitter after a temporary suspension." However, hours later that same day, Dorsey approved a "repeat offender for civic integrity" policy. This was a new system in which five strikes would result in permanent suspension. An ad hoc formula to oust Donald Trump forever.

Trump was banned from the platform the next day due to what Twitter said was an alleged "risk of further incitement to violence."

No internal opposition to censorship

Shellenberger's thread reflects how Twitter employees went from being initially hesitant about Trump's ban on the platform to actively participating in it. During the events revealed by the journalist (Jan. 7, 2021), Jack Dorsey was on vacation and delegated much of the responsibility to senior executives, including former head of Twitter security Yoel Roth and head of legal Vijaya Gadde, known for her censorship policies on the platform.

The only opposition seemed to come from a junior company employee, who pointed out that making "ad hoc decisions like this that don’t appear rooted in policy are a slippery slope."

tracking