Subsidies for Hollywood? Newsom's tax incentives paid for with taxpayer money
The governor of California granted tax breaks to 35 film productions, including movies from major studios.

A replica of the Hollywood sign for a movie (File photo)
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, announced a new round of tax incentives for 35 film productions, a move that has drawn criticism for using public funds to benefit major Hollywood studios.
According to a report by The Center Square, in an article published by Just the News, the projects receiving incentives include "Michael 2," the sequel to the biopic about Michael Jackson, "Last Friday," from New Line Cinema, and a new Paramount Pictures production. Of the total, 28 are independent films.
The program allows production companies to reduce their tax liabilities in exchange for developing projects in California. Its annual cap was raised from $330 million to $750 million to encourage filming and prevent the industry from moving its operations to other states or countries.
Politics
Newsom says Trump is 'mentally ill,' calls for 25th Amendment over remarks on Los Angeles and San Diego
Carlos Dominguez
A tool to attract investment and preserve jobs?
According to an official statement from the California government, the new productions are projected to generate $1.08 billion in production spending and 5,453 jobs for actors and technical staff. Newsom defended the initiative as a tool to attract investment and preserve jobs.
However, economists consulted by The Center Square questioned the cost of the policy. Wayne Winegarden of the Pacific Research Institute argued that the need to offer subsidies highlights California's lack of competitiveness, while Schuyler Moore, an attorney specializing in entertainment law, warned that the program ultimately favors major studios rather than independent production companies.
The debate centers on whether the economic and employment benefits justify the tax revenue the state is forgoing. While the Newsom administration defends the incentives as an investment to revive the film industry, its critics argue that they shift part of the cost of private productions onto taxpayers.